![]() ![]() “It made us realize that these models maybe aren’t so great just alone. However, things changed when he gave GPT-4 access to scientific papers, things changed dramatically. “It was really surprising because it would look so realistic, but it would hallucinate an atom here. “At first, I was actually not that impressed," White says. He told Nature that initially he was not impressed with the chatbot. “They can keep building upon their research, but for the community at large, it’s a dead end."Īnother researcher Andrew White, a chemical engineer at University of Rochester, was given access to ChatGPT-4 as a ‘red-teamer’: a person paid by OpenAI to test the platform to try and make it do something bad. “All of these closed-source models, they are essentially dead-ends in science," Nature quoted Sasha Luccioni, a research scientist specializing in climate at HuggingFace, an open-source-AI community. The researcher world is frustrated because there is extreme secrecy around Open AI's ChatGPT 4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |